Sunday, April 7, 2024

WHEN I HAD GOT SO FAR IN MY LIST I THREW IT INTO THE FIRE

 

 
When I had got so far in my list I threw it into the fire in despair. "If I can only find what the fellow is driving at by reconciling all these accomplishments, and discovering a calling which needs them all," I said to myself. -- Dr. John H. Watson, A Study in Scarlet

Watson's perplexed list making of Sherlock Holmes's limits in the early pages of A Study in Scarlet is one of my favorite gifts from among the many gifts Arthur Conan Doyle extends to the Sherlockian within that book. In addition to providing endless fodder for discussion among those of us playing the great game, it is one part of the way A Study in Scarlet teaches us how to operate, Watson style: Think it through, make an itemized list of ideas, think it through some more, ask some questions, put yourself in the right place at the right time, take a chance at doing something new, do a little leg work, drink and smoke a little, and then write it all down in an engaging manner. 

Not too shabby of a modus operandi, yes? I like it and I've been thinking about how to emulate Watson's style as work begins on my next book, Sherlock Holmes: Into the Fire, due next year from Belanger Books. (And, yes, it is not lost on me that my last post prior to this one, in December, before my three-month hiatus, questioned whether I would do any more Holmes writing.) Things tend to work out as Derrick Belanger once told me: "About the time you think you're done with Holmes, Watson starts whispering in your ear."

The idea for this book actually originated with the brilliant Dr. Mark Jones several years ago; he mentioned it to me in conversation, and then we discussed co-editing the book along with the equally brilliant Nancy Holder. Sadly, busy schedules and too much real life kept getting in the way. The idea, to have an anthology of Arthur Conan Doyle's Round The Fire stories rewritten as Sherlock Holmes adventures, languished. This February, three or four years on, I had some time and some thoughts about what the book might look like--how it might be structured to meet Mark's vision and to best please readers.  Therefore, with his urging and with enthusiastic support from Belanger Books, I'm going to spend the next ten months working to bring it to life.

Arthur Conan Doyle wrote in his preface to Round The Fire that the stories were concerned "...with the grotesque and with the terrible." Mixing Holmes and these stories seemed to make sense to me when I considered two of his statements from The Hound of the Baskervilles:

The grotesque, inconceivable nature of the device only served to make it more effective.

The more outré and grotesque an incident is the more carefully it deserves to be examined, and the very point which appears to complicate a case is, when duly considered and scientifically handled, the one which is most likely to elucidate it.

Those two thoughts are now the underlying premise of the book.  A few of the stories have, of course, been adapted to Holmes and Watson before but that does not mean a skilled writer might not find something new to do with the inspiration. Finding the needed skilled writer (actually 17 skilled writers) became my first hurdle. And my first list: the names of skilled writers whose work would elevate the book if I should be so lucky to have them agree to write for it. I then made a second list, the 17 inspiration stories:

  • THE LEATHER FUNNEL                     
  • THE BEETLE HUNTER      
  • THE MAN WITH THE WATCHES             
  • THE POT OF CAVIARE 
  • THE JAPANNED BOX                 
  • THE BLACK DOCTOR  
  • PLAYING WITH FIRE                
  • THE JEW'S BREASTPLATE
  • THE LOST SPECIAL                     
  • THE CLUB-FOOTED GROCER 
  • THE SEALED ROOM                  
  • THE BRAZILIAN CAT 
  • THE USHER OF LEA HOUSE SCHOOL            
  • THE BROWN HAND 
  • THE FIEND OF THE COOPERAGE             
  • JELLAND'S VOYAGE 
  • B. 24

Then I spent a week sending invitations, three or four at a time, asking the writers on list one to come on board by choosing a story from list two. The pairings were made within eight days. The response was stellar. 

I breathed a big sigh of relief and offered a toast to the good doctor. (I skipped the smoking, although I have wondered in the past if it is necessary to smoke in order to work with Holmes and Watson.) Watson might approve of my work. I had reconciled the accomplished writers with a calling that needed them all. And I did throw my list Into The Fire, but not in despair. 

Well, not yet anyway; we still have ten months to go. Anything can happen. At the moment, I feel very much like Watson did when he set out to find Isa Whitney:

And so in ten minutes I had left my armchair and cheery sitting-room behind me, and was speeding eastward in a hansom on a strange errand, as it seemed to me at the time, though the future only could show how strange it was to be.

How strange is this errand going to be? I don't know but I'm looking forward to finding out.


 

 

 

Friday, December 22, 2023

TO LET THE PRESENT AND THE FUTURE ALONE


"The ideas of my friend Watson, though limited, are exceedingly pertinacious. For a long time he has worried me to write an experience of my own."--Sherlock Holmes, "The Adventure of the Blanched Soldier"

Sherlock Holmes rather famously began his account of "The Adventure of the Blanched Soldier" with a memorable explanation of why he was choosing to write of the events rather than leaving the task to Dr. Watson. His tone begins slightly snarky and then gives way to admitting "...the matter must be presented in such a way as may interest the reader."

For those of you kind enough to read along with this space over the past twenty months you know I've been somewhat obsessed with the finding of the best possible way for me to write "an experience of my own" and to do so "in such a way as may interest the reader."  I've studied Arthur Conan Doyle's words repeatedly in that time and written here every fourteen days or so about the studying, Doyle, Sherlock Holmes, and Dr. Watson. The intention has been to help me think about the process of creating two manuscripts for Belanger Books.

The books are now finished and orders are being filled. I think it may be time to stop "Doting on Doyle" for awhile. I need to expand my reading diet  and see what the muse brings for the next writings. I'm not clear as to what is next but it may not include Doyle, Holmes or Watson.

In "The Adventure of the Blanched Soldier," James M. Dodd tells Sherlock Holmes about a conversation he had with Colonel Emsworth wherein the Colonel warned Dodd off of asking questions. He told Dodd: "...but I would ask you to let the present and the future alone. Such inquiries serve no useful purpose, sir, and place us in a delicate and difficult position."

I have one Holmes-related writing obligation due soon. Once it is finished, I'm going "to let the present and the future alone."  It is time to sit quietly and see what comes; questioning myself about what is next serves no useful purpose. I simply don't know yet. 

I have no doubt the answer will come. As Sherlock Holmes taught me: "Are there not subtle forces at work of which we know little?"

 

Sunday, December 3, 2023

MAN, IT'S WITCHCRAFT!






































"Man, it's witchcraft! Where in the name of all that is wonderful did you get those names?"

In the opening of The Valley of Fear, Sherlock Holmes surprises Inspector MacDonald with the list of words pertaining to MacDonald's as yet unstated case. We know, of course, that Holmes has the names because of his informant within Moriarty's camp. Before MacDonald's arrival, Holmes had the information but didn't know yet how he would use it or why he would need it but he knew it could somehow prove to be important or of use in some way. Holmes's ways of gathering information and docketing seemingly random bits that often proved to be useful later were not perhaps "witchcraft" but they certainly were part of his investigative craft. 

Since I started studying the craft of fiction writing I've learned from Holmes: reading everything even remotely of interest and docketing seemingly random bits that might matter later have become part of my routine. I've always read a wide variety of writing and saved things that interested me but it was not until I started writing fiction that I began putting my odd saved bits into a system that makes retrieval fairly easy. [Oddly, the saved things are better on paper rather than digital although I always use a computer to write. Brains are weird.]

I recently had cause to think about the system and how it affects the writing as a friend (after reading two short pieces of my writing) told me my writing has "many layers." She then asked "how do you do that?" I'm not sure if she really wanted an answer to the question.

If she did, I might could demonstrate with one of the pieces she read, a brief Gothic bit written for a Flash Fiction prompt. "Come to Me" has several layers although it runs only 1,300 words:

1--The opening of Chapter 6, Mina Murray's Journal, from Bram Stoker's Dracula, as annotated by Leslie Klinger;

2--The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, the memoir by journalist Jean-Dominique Bauby about living with locked-in syndrome;

3-- "Echo", a poem by Christina Rossetti from 1854;

4-- "Harmony in the Boudoir", a poem by Mark Strand from 2012;

5--The "Witte Wieven" of Dutch mythology, as described by author Signe Maene. [I'm a bit obsessed with these women; they have had a role in three of my recent fictions.]

6--A quote from Arthur Conan Doyle's The Stark Munro Letters, "I thought I knew something of women. ... But now I can see that I really knew nothing. My knowledge was external. I did not not know the woman soul, that crowning gift of Providence to man, which, if we do not ourselves degrade it, will set an edge to all that is good in us."

Would she understand why these things rose to the surface of the writing brain at the same time? I don't know. I think the pocket-Petrarch-toting Holmes might understand even if he later told me "No ghosts need apply."

----------------------------------------------

 I've posted "Come to Me" below, should there be any interest in how the pieces came together.

Come to Me

By Margie Deck

The small cell window allows the merest hint of the dawn but after these many days I recognize the hour. How many days, I cannot say. The mist before my eyes clouds my memories; I don’t remember coming here or who championed my imprisonment. If I hold my breath, with my eyes closed against the mist, I can faintly recall lingering in the forenoon light in the Abbey, waiting for the imprint of what once was.

              Light passes across the window in varying shades and shadows. I hear the wind breathing with me, rhythmic and cold. In the early morning of the past few days I’ve seen a red flag waving there. It is not always there. The red reminds me of the red-tiled roofs of the Whitby houses piled on one another. As I sat in the ruins of that great repository of the past, I often looked down on the old town, wondering if someone there stood looking up—searching, like me, for a glimpse of the rumored White Lady, searching for proof the dead may return.

              My wife, angry, defeated, did not understand why I waited, week after week, hoping to encounter a dead woman while she sat alone, waiting for me. She did not hear the words behind my words, all the words I could not utter, my true words of fear and failure. Sometimes I think I hear her calling to me here, her voice riding on the cold air. She is not at the window although the flag is the color of her favorite dress. I do not see her. I thought I heard her in the Abbey, too.

              My limbs are heavy. If I could move I would try to open the window, try to return to my watch. Time is passing. The historian assures the White Lady is only seen in the summer months, in one of the highest windows; he names her as St. Hilda, if indeed she comes at all. Does he not know of the many other white women of lore—many far from saintly. The poet told us of the woman Constance walled alive within St. Hilda’s convent; she might well be keeping the watch now. The women die, they return, some wise, some sly, some luring foolish men like me to their deaths in the water. But if they return so may I have another chance. Perhaps tomorrow she might give me what I need.

              I am so cold. Perhaps the summer has passed already. If my wife were here I would quote Rossetti to her although it would make her angry. Once she loved me when I fed her poetry; now she hungers for something more from me. If I could speak—

Yet come to me in dreams, that I may live

My very life again tho’ cold in death:

Come back to me in dreams, that I may give

Pulse for pulse, breath for breath:

Speak low, lean low,

As long ago, my love, how long ago.

 

###

“Madam,” the doctor said in a low firm voice, “please move away. He does not know you are here. He cannot hear you calling his name. I’m afraid there is no hope.”

              The woman stepped back from the bed, pulled her red shawl tightly around her body, shook her head at the doctor’s words. “But his eye! I see his right eye moving when I put my hand to his face, when I talk to him. I am sure he understands.”

              “No, madam, this is 1901, the new century. Modern medicine tells us he is paralyzed from his fall, almost completely. The eye movement is simply a nervous reaction of the body. Your husband is dying; it is unusual he survived the night in his condition. Perhaps you can find comfort in knowing he feels nothing. He is aware of nothing. He has no pain.”

              She placed her hand against the cheek of the dying man, then drew her hand across his eyes.

              “My husband is always aware of everything—life is always painful to him in many ways.”

              The doctor turned at a tap at the door, spoke to someone in the corridor, nodded. “Madam,” he said in the same firm tone, “perhaps you can step into the next room for a moment. The gentlemen from the constabulary wish to speak to you.” He opened the door and gestured to her to follow him.

              The two constables and the woman stood for several minutes in uncomfortable silence in the doctor’s small ante room after he left them with a murmur about pressing business. The taller man finally took out a small notebook and pencil.

              “Please tell us what happened to your husband yesterday.”

              “My husband went to the Abbey as he often does to...think. My husband is a sensitive and intelligent man,” she said with an air of resignation. “I followed him a short while later as I often do. I waited for him in the St. Mary’s yard. After an hour, he crossed from the Abbey to the churchyard, passing me where I sat on one of the benches set there among the graves. He did not stop although I called to him. He eventually slowed near the end of the stonework, at that point where the stonework stretches out over the pathway far below. To my horror he suddenly went over the side.”

              Both constables nodded. “Was there anyone else in the churchyard who saw what happened?” the shorter man asked, his pencil poised above his own small, lined paper.

              “What? Yes, of course. The three old fishermen who sit on a bench there every day, doing nothing but talking. They were quite kind to me; they feared I would faint from the shock but I never faint. I knew I needed to get to my husband. It took me a long time to reach him as I had to transverse the endless steps down.  We were all shocked by the horrible accident.”

              “Your husband did not have an accident,” the shorter constable said.

              “He was pushed,” the other said. “Did you push him?”

              The woman made a dismissive wave of her hand. “You’re wrong. My husband stood there with no other humans.  The four of us saw him against the open view out to sea. Why would you say such a thing?”

              “The handprints, madam,” the tall man said. “Someone gripped your husband hard enough to leave bruising marks on his back. Ten perfect finger marks, two hands, smallish but strong. Quite fresh. The doctor is certain. Your husband may not be dead yet but he was murdered.”

              The woman’s face settled into a hard look. “She pushed him, then. He was determined to leave the demands of this world. She could do what I could not. She could set him free.”

              “But you said he was alone!” the tall man protested, snapping his notebook closed.

              “I said, we did not see another human. The White Lady. He surely courted her with Rosetti. No woman could resist.”

              Tall man shook his head. “You expect us to believe a ghost, the supposed lady spirit of the Abbey pushed your husband?”

              “Frankly, gentlemen, I do not care what you believe. My husband believed it and that, apparently, was enough. Now you must excuse me. I must arrange my husband’s funeral services.”

              “He is not dead yet,” the two men said in unplanned unison.

              “He is to me.”

###

The wife pulled the blankets tight around her husband’s cold body. She placed her head on his heart, listening to his raspy breath.  “Goodbye, husband,” she whispered. “Is it my turn to quote Rosetti to you? Perhaps you thought I did not listen.”

Come to me in the silence of the night;

   Come in the speaking silence of a dream;

Come with soft rounded cheeks and eyes as bright

   As sunlight on a stream;

      Come back in tears,

O memory, hope, love of finished years.

 

              She did not see the rapidly blinking right eye as she left the room.     

 

 

Tuesday, November 14, 2023

LET US GLANCE AT OUR GAZETTEER #4

 Over the course of this year, I've written four short essays about Arthur Conan Doyle for inclusion in the Sherlock's Spotlight Gazette published by The Beacon Society for young readers. As I finished work on the final essay for 2023, I decided to post the four to this site. Here is the last, a story from Jerome K. Jerome about a vacation in Norway, including a moment in time when Arthur Conan Doyle got a bit ahead of himself.

 

Conan Doyle and family members, Norway, 1892 & Jerome K. Jerome, circa 1890

 

About Arthur, the Author

Glimpses into the life of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, creator of Sherlock Holmes

 

The Adventure of the Overconfident Writer

 

By the summer of 1892, a year had passed since Arthur Conan Doyle had made the decision to give up his medical practice with the intention of supporting his family as a publishing author. Feeling very confident in his abilities and bolstered by his strong work ethic, his writing output grew and grew, as did his income and literary fame. 

 

Without a medical practice to attend to, Conan Doyle had time to meet many other successful writers including the humorist Jerome K. Jerome, one of the founders of a new magazine, The Idler. The two men became good friends, so much so that when Conan Doyle took his family to Norway for a vacation that August, Jerome went along for the fun.

It is from this humorist that we learn of an incident in Norway wherein Conan Doyle had a bit too much confidence in his abilities and was left afoot when he inadvertently gave away the horse to his carriage:

Doyle was always full of superfluous energy. He started to learn Norwegian on the boat. He go on so well that he became conceited; and one day, at a little rest house up among the mountains, he lost his head. We had come there in stoljas—a tiny carriage only just big enough for one person, drawn by a pony about the size of a Newfoundland dog, but marvelously sturdy. They will trot their fifty miles in the day and be frisky in the evening. While we were lunching, with some twenty miles still in front of us, a young officer came into the room, and said something in Norwegian. Of course we turned on to Doyle; and Doyle rose and bowed and answered him. We all watched the conversation. The young Norwegian officer was evidently charmed with Doyle, while Doyle stood ladling out Norwegian as though it had been his mother tongue. After the officer was gone, we asked Doyle what it was all about.

“Oh, just about the weather, and the state of the roads, and how some relation of his had hurt his leg,” answered Doyle carelessly. “Of course I didn’t understand all of it.” He turned the conversation.

When we had finished lunch, and the stoljas were brought out, Doyle’s pony was missing. It appeared Doyle had “lent” it to the young officer, whose own pony had gone lame. The ostler, who was also the waiter, had overheard the conversation. Doyle had said “Certainly, with pleasure.” He had said it once or twice. Also the Norwegian equivalent for: “Don’t mention it.”

There wasn’t another pony within ten miles. One of our party, who had taken a fancy to the view, and thought he would like to spend a day or two in the neighborhood, let Doyle have his stolja. But for the rest of that trip, Doyle talked less Norwegian.

Jerome included his memory of the comical horse event in his 1926 autobiography, My Life and Times. Conan Doyle and Jerome remained friends for many years, despite not always agreeing as to politics and spiritual matters. Jerome dedicated his book, Novel Notes, to “Big-Hearted, Big-Souled, Big-Bodied Friend Conan Doyle.” 

 

 

Sources:

Stashower, Daniel. Teller of Tales: The Life of Arthur Conan Doyle. Henry Holt and Company, Inc., 1999, pp. 126-27, 135-36, 166-68, 169, 260, 329.

Jerome, Jerome K., My Life and Times. 1925. Independently Published, Amazon Associate Publishing, 2023, pp. 108-11, 142, 174.

The Arthur Conan Doyle Encyclopedia: A Life in Pictures, https://www.arthur-conan-doyle.com. Accessed 4 October 2023.

Britannica: Jerome K. Jerome, English Writer. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jerome-K-Jerome. Accessed 6 October 2023.